Measuring Knowledge and Learning

James J. Heckman and Jin Zhou

No 29990, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: Empirical studies in the economics of education, the measurement of skill gaps, the impacts of interventions on skill formation, and the value-added literature rely on psychometrically validated test scores. Test scores are taken as measures of an invariant scale of human capital compared over time and people. We examine if conventional skill measures are comparable on mastery of specific task knowledge. An unusually rich dataset from an early childhood intervention is used to test the assumption of scale invariance. We reject the scale invariance hypothesis for multiple skills and cast doubt on the uncritical use of test scores in research.

JEL-codes: C81 I21 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-ino, nep-lma, nep-ltv, nep-neu and nep-ure
Note: CH ED TWP
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29990.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:29990

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w29990

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().