The Impact of Money in Politics on Labor and Capital: Evidence from Citizens United v. FEC

Pat Akey, Tania Babina, Greg Buchak and Ana-Maria Tenekedjieva

No 31481, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: We examine whether corporate money in politics benefits or hurts labor using the 2010 Supreme Court ruling Citizens United, which rendered bans on political election spending unconstitutional. In difference-in-difference analyses, affected states experience increases in both capital and labor income relative to unaffected states. We find evidence consistent with increased political spending spurring political competition and the adoption of pro-growth policies. These policies benefit a broader set of constituents as we find a broad-based increase in labor income. Affected states see increased political turnover and reduced regulatory burdens. The economic effects are stronger among ex-ante politically inactive and younger firms.

JEL-codes: D72 E25 G38 J30 P16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lma, nep-mon and nep-pol
Note: CF LE LS PE PR
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31481.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31481

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w31481

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().