Project Development with Delegated Bargaining: The Role of Elevated Hurdle Rates

John W. Barry, Bruce I. Carlin, Alan D. Crane and John Graham

No 32283, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc

Abstract: During project development, costs are endogenously determined through delegated bargaining with counterparties. In surveys, nearly 80% of CFOs report using an elevated hurdle rate, the implications of which we explore in a delegated bargaining model. We show that elevated hurdle rates can convey a bargaining advantage that exceeds the opportunity cost of forgone projects, whether hurdle rate buffers arise for strategic or non-strategic reasons. Using CFO survey data, we find buffer use is negatively related to the cost of capital and ex ante bargaining power, consistent with the model, and that realized returns exhibit “beat the hurdle rate benchmark” behavior.

JEL-codes: D21 G30 G31 G34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-gth and nep-ppm
Note: CF
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w32283.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32283

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w32283

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().