Compressed Equilibrium in Large Repeated Games of Incomplete Information
Ehud Kalai and
Eran Shmaya
Discussion Papers from Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science
Abstract:
Due to their many applications, large Bayesian games have been a subject of growing interest in game theory and related fields. But to a large extent, models (1) have been restricted to one-shot interaction, (2) are based on an assumption that player types are independent and (3) assume that the number of players is known. The current paper develops a general theory of Bayesian repeated large games that avoids some of these difficulties. To make the analysis more robust, it develops a concept of compressed equilibrium which is applicable to a general class of Bayesian repeated large anonymous games. JEL Classification Numbers: C72, C72
Keywords: Nash Anonymous games; Nash equilibrium; Repeated games; Large games; Bayesian equilibrium; Price taking; Rational expectations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-04-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cta, nep-gth, nep-hpe and nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/nwucmsems/1562.htm main text (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1562
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Northwestern University, 580 Jacobs Center, 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-2014. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Fran Walker ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).