A comparison of five recursive partitioning methods to find person subgroups involved in meaningful treatment–subgroup interactions

L. Doove (), E. Dusseldorp, K. Deun and I. Mechelen

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2014, vol. 8, issue 4, 403-425

Abstract: In case multiple treatment alternatives are available for some medical problem, the detection of treatment–subgroup interactions (i.e., relative treatment effectiveness varying over subgroups of persons) is of key importance for personalized medicine and the development of optimal treatment assignment strategies. Randomized Clinical Trials (RCT) often go without clear a priori hypotheses on the subgroups involved in treatment–subgroup interactions, and with a large number of pre-treatment characteristics in the data. In such situations, relevant subgroups (defined in terms of pre-treatment characteristics) are to be induced during the actual data analysis. This comes down to a problem of cluster analysis, with the goal of this analysis being to find clusters of persons that are involved in meaningful treatment–person cluster interactions. For such a cluster analysis, five recently proposed methods can be used, all being of a recursive partitioning type. However, these five methods have been developed almost independently, and the relations between them are not yet understood. The present paper closes this gap. It starts by outlining the basic principles behind each method, and by illustrating it with an application on an RCT data set on two treatment strategies for substance abuse problems. Next, it presents a comparison of the methods, hereby focusing on major similarities and differences. The discussion concludes with practical advice for end users with regard to the selection of a suitable method, and with an important challenge for future research in this area. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Keywords: Treatment heterogeneity; Recursive partitioning; Subgroup analysis; Treatment–subgroup interaction; 62H30; 62L99; 62P10; 62P15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11634-013-0159-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:advdac:v:8:y:2014:i:4:p:403-425

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ds/journal/11634/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11634-013-0159-x

Access Statistics for this article

Advances in Data Analysis and Classification is currently edited by H.-H. Bock, W. Gaul, A. Okada, M. Vichi and C. Weihs

More articles in Advances in Data Analysis and Classification from Springer, German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl), Japanese Classification Society (JCS), Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG), International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().