Emerging sociotechnical imaginaries for gene edited crops for foods in the United States: implications for governance
Carmen Bain (cbain@iastate.edu),
Sonja Lindberg and
Theresa Selfa
Additional contact information
Carmen Bain: Iowa State University
Sonja Lindberg: Iowa State University
Theresa Selfa: SUNY-College of Environmental Studies and Forestry
Agriculture and Human Values, 2020, vol. 37, issue 2, No 1, 265-279
Abstract:
Abstract Gene editing techniques, such as CRISPR, are being heralded as powerful new tools for delivering agricultural products and foods with a variety of beneficial traits quickly, easily, and cheaply. Proponents are concerned, however, about whether the public will accept the new technology and that excessive regulatory oversight could limit the technology’s potential. In this paper, we draw on the sociotechnical imaginaries literature to examine how proponents are imagining the potential benefits and risks of gene editing technologies within agriculture. We derive our data from a content analysis of public comments submitted to the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) 2017 docket titled “Genome Editing in New Plant Varieties Used for Food.” Our sample frame consists of 26 comments representing 30 agriculture and biotech companies, organizations, and trade associations. Our findings reveal three key sociotechnical imaginaries, including that gene editing technologies in agriculture: (1) are not GMO but instead equivalent to traditional plant breeding; (2) have the potential to usher in a new Green Revolution; and (3) could facilitate the democratization of agricultural biotechnologies. We argue that forming and projecting these collective interpretations of the potential of gene editing technologies for crops and foods plays an important role in efforts by proponents to influence regulatory oversight, modes of governance, and build public acceptance. This research contributes to calls by science and technology studies scholars to investigate emergent concerns and imaginaries for novel technoscientific advances to help inform upstream models of public engagement and governance decisions.
Keywords: Biotechnology; Food and agriculture; Governance; Consumer acceptance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-019-09980-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:37:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s10460-019-09980-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/10460
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-019-09980-9
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture and Human Values is currently edited by Harvey S. James Jr.
More articles in Agriculture and Human Values from Springer, The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).