EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A collective alternative to the Inward Turn in environmental sustainability research

Chad S. Boda (), David O’Byrne, David Harnesk, Turaj Faran and Ellinor Isgren
Additional contact information
Chad S. Boda: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies
David O’Byrne: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies
David Harnesk: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies
Turaj Faran: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies
Ellinor Isgren: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2022, vol. 12, issue 2, No 10, 297 pages

Abstract: Abstract It has become quite common in environmental sustainability research to promote the influencing of so-called inner dimensions of individuals as means to address pressing environmental problems such as climate change, what we refer to as the Inward Turn. We argue that the conceptual foundations of the Inward Turn, an extreme form of methodological individualism, limit it significantly as a strategy for addressing climate change and other socially relevant environmental problems. After briefly reviewing major shortcomings with the way the Inward Turn conceptualizes the relationship between individuals and social change, including its neglect of causal structures and propensity to abstract its analysis away from problems that are specific to place and time, we sketch the basic tenets of an alternative methodological approach capable of overcoming these limitations. Our approach, however, does not go to the other extreme and neglect the role of individuals; rather, our recognition of the structural drivers of particular environmental problems points to the necessity of specific collective actions by individuals, for example, in the practice of social movements. This recognition demands a rethinking of the role of individual factors, like emotion and empathy, in addressing environmental sustainability problems, namely as they relate to collective action/social movement emergence, development, and outcomes.

Keywords: Individual action; Methodological individualism; Agent and structure; Collective action; Structural change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13412-021-00738-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13412-021-00738-6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/economics/journal/13412

DOI: 10.1007/s13412-021-00738-6

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences is currently edited by Walter A. Rosenbaum

More articles in Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences from Springer, Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:spr:jenvss:v:12:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s13412-021-00738-6