The impact of prudence on optimal prevention

Louis Eeckhoudt and Christian Gollier ()

Economic Theory, 2005, vol. 26, issue 4, 989-994

Abstract: What are the determinants of the optimal level of effort to reduce the probability of a loss to occur? Whereas most of the literature on this question focused on risk aversion, we show that the concept of prudence (i.e., a positive third derivative of the utility function) is essential to answer this question. We explain in this paper that prudence and prevention tend to be opponents rather than allies contrary to the intuition attached to everyday language. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Keywords: Stochastic dominance; Prudence; Prevention. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (149)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00199-004-0548-7 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The impact of prudence on optimal prevention (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:spr:joecth:v:26:y:2005:i:4:p:989-994

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... eory/journal/199/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s00199-004-0548-7

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Theory is currently edited by Nichoals Yanneils

More articles in Economic Theory from Springer, Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().