Designing and implementing a comprehensive assessment plan for a graduate accounting programme

David Stout, James Borden, Melinda German and Thomas Monahan

Accounting Education, 2005, vol. 14, issue 4, 395-410

Abstract: Accounting programmes are being challenged (e.g. Albrecht and Sack, 2000) to make accounting curricula more relevant and to present assessment data regarding the efficacy of course and curricular offerings. In addition, assessment is embedded in current accreditation standards in the USA by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International as fundamentally important to motivating continuous improvement (AACSB 2005). However, survey results in this area (viz., Kimmel et al., 1998, Issues in Accounting Education, 13(4), pp. 851-868 and Calderon et al., 2003, Best Practices in Accounting Program Assessment, Sarasota, FL: Teaching and Curriculum Section, American Accounting Association) indicate that assessment is not as widespread as might be expected. Further, Akers et al. (1997 Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), pp. 259-280) note that the accounting education literature is limited with respect to descriptive accounts of assessment programme design and implementation results. This paper offers a framework, consisting of three key attributes (broad-based involvement, multi-trait/multi-method approach, and assessment follow-up), that can be used to guide the development and implementation of a programme-level assessment plan in accounting. A case study applies this framework to the development and implementation of an assessment plan for a graduate accounting programme in the USA. This plan includes multiple assessment measures and provides feedback regarding both academic (curriculum-related) and administrative (operational) dimensions of performance. To demonstrate the value of such a plan, a discussion of programme changes made in response to assessment data collected to date is included. While the application of this framework is to a USA context, the framework is such that it can be used more generally to guide the design and implementation of an effective programme-level assessment plan.

Keywords: AACSB accreditation; program-level assessment; outcomes assessment; direct assessment measures; indirect assessment measures; graduate accounting programs; multi-trait/multi-method assessment plan (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/06939280500346045 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accted:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:395-410

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAED20

DOI: 10.1080/06939280500346045

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Education is currently edited by Richard Wilson

More articles in Accounting Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().