Explicit and Implicit Subject Bias in the ABS Journal Quality Guide
Andreas G. F. Hoepner and
Jeffrey Unerman
Accounting Education, 2012, vol. 21, issue 1, 3-15
Abstract:
This paper addresses issues raised in two recent papers published in this journal about the UK Association of Business Schools' Journal Quality Guide (ABS Guide) . While much of the debate about journal rankings in general, and the ABS Guide in particular, has focused on the construction, power and (mis)use of these rankings, this paper differs in that it explains and provides evidence about explicit and implicit biases in the ABS Guide . In so doing, it poses potentially difficult questions that the editors of the ABS Guide need to address and urgently rectify if the ABS Guide seeks to build and retain legitimacy. In particular, the evidence in this paper shows explicit bias in the ABS Guide against several subject areas, including accounting and finance. It also shows implicit bias against accounting and finance when comparing journal rankings in sub-areas shared between accounting and finance and the broader business management subject areas.
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09639284.2011.651291 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accted:v:21:y:2012:i:1:p:3-15
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAED20
DOI: 10.1080/09639284.2011.651291
Access Statistics for this article
Accounting Education is currently edited by Richard Wilson
More articles in Accounting Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().