Some empirical evidence on the superiority of the problem-based learning (PBL) method

Gaetan Breton

Accounting Education, 1999, vol. 8, issue 1, 1-12

Abstract: This study compares the effects of two different teaching methods used concurrently on two comparable classes of accounting theory. The first method is the traditional lecture along with assignments and examinations. The second method is an application of the problem-based learning approach, the hypothesis being that such a method will produce better results in terms of acquisition of knowledge and aptitude to deal with problems in a long term perspective. The experimental group was submitted to this method and the control group was lectured as usual. Significant differences in the marks for the final examinations between both groups were found. The PBL group was associated with better marks to most questions. Another interesting finding was the perception of the PBL group to have acquired better and longer lasting knowledge.

Keywords: Accounting Education; Problem-based Learning; Lecturing; Problem Solving (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/096392899331008 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:accted:v:8:y:1999:i:1:p:1-12

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAED20

DOI: 10.1080/096392899331008

Access Statistics for this article

Accounting Education is currently edited by Richard Wilson

More articles in Accounting Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().