Purchasing Power Parity Tests In Cointegrated Panels

Peter Pedroni

The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001, vol. 83, issue 4, 727-731

Abstract: This paper employs recently developed techniques for testing hypotheses in cointegrated panels to test the strong version of purchasing power parity for a panel of post Bretton Woods data. We compare results using fully modified and dynamic OLS approaches, and strongly reject the hypothesis. We also introduce a new between-dimension dynamic OLS estimator and find that the between-dimension FMOLS and DOLS estimates of the long-run deviation from purchasing power parity are larger than the corresponding within-dimension estimates. Finally, we attempt to reconcile these rejections with the mixed findings that have been reported in panel unit root studies. © 2001 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (956)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/003465301753237803 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels (2001)
Software Item: RATS programs to replicate Pedroni PPP tests on panel data
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:83:y:2001:i:4:p:727-731

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://mitpressjour ... rnal/?issn=0034-6535

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Economics and Statistics is currently edited by Pierre Azoulay, Olivier Coibion, Will Dobbie, Raymond Fisman, Benjamin R. Handel, Brian A. Jacob, Kareen Rozen, Xiaoxia Shi, Tavneet Suri and Yi Xu

More articles in The Review of Economics and Statistics from MIT Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The MIT Press ().