2D:4D does not predict economic preferences: Evidence from a large, representative sample

Levent Neyse, Magnus Johannesson and Anna Dreber

EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, 2021, vol. 185, 390-401

Abstract: The digit ratio (2D:4D) is considered a proxy for testosterone exposure in utero, and there has been a recent surge of studies testing whether 2D:4D is associated with economic preferences. Although the results are not conclusive, previous studies have reported statistically significant correlations between 2D:4D and risk taking, altruism, positive reciprocity, negative reciprocity and trust. However, most previous studies have small sample sizes gathered from university students and there is also no consensus on the type of analysis (e.g., which hand to analyze or subgroup to focus on) or the preference elicitation method. We present results from a pre-registered large sample study testing if 2D:4D is associated with economic preferences. Data were collected in a representative sample of adults in the German Socioeconomic Panel-Innovation Sample (SOEP-IS), in a sample of about 3450 respondents (about 5 times larger than the previously largest study in this field). Using experimentally validated survey questions, we find no statistically significant association between 2D:4D and economic preferences in the largest study to this date on the topic.

Keywords: Economic behavior; Prenatal hormones; Testosterone; Digit ratio (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D03 D87 D9 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235709/1/L ... 20Preferences_VV.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: 2D:4D does not predict economic preferences: Evidence from a large, representative sample (2021)
Working Paper: 2D:4D Does Not Predict Economic Preferences: Evidence from a Large, Representative Sample (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:espost:235709

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.02.029

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters from ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics ().