The influence of risk classification and community affiliation on the acceptance of user-innovated medical devices
Jakob Fiedler,
André Schorn and
Cornelius Herstatt
No 115, Working Papers from Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management
Abstract:
User innovation contributes significantly to societal advancement, particularly in developing novel products and services, offering substantial financial potential, and fostering the common good. This is particularly evident in medical science, where it addresses diverse needs and is often shared at minimal or no cost. However, the diffusion of user-innovated products remains limited and research on the perception of user-innovated products is rather scarce, reducing their potential contributions to the common good. This paper investigates end-users' perceptions of user innovation, a critical yet underexplored aspect of diffusion. Specifically, using a mixed-methods approach, we examine the influence of product risk classification and community development on the perception of user-innovated medical devices. This study combines qualitative research through semi-structured interviews (n=5) and quantitative research using a 2x3 (User Innovation vs. Producer Innovation; Product risk classification I, II, III) between-subject experiment (n=301). Our findings reveal that end-users evaluate user-innovated and traditionally-innovated products differently based on various criteria. User-innovated products are perceived as more pleasant and attractive, while traditionallyinnovated products are viewed as safer and of higher value. This effect is more pronounced for products with higher risk classifications. However, the perceived lower safety and value of user innovation products result in a reduced willingness to purchase among end-users. Additionally, we find that community-developed user-innovated products consistently outperform in all evaluation categories compared to "pure" user-innovated products.
Keywords: User Innovation; Medical Engineering; Diffusion of Innovation; MMR; Consumer Acceptance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-rmg
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/280409/1/1871830176.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:zbw:tuhtim:280409
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (econstor@zbw-workspace.eu).