 Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and KazakhstanL. V. Smorgunov () Administrative Consulting, 2021, issue 12 Abstract: Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan are among the highly developed countries in the UN e-Government Development Index. With a high rate of digitalization of public administration, solving the problems of citizens' access to the Internet and developing the electronic services sector, these countries differ from each other in the design of a digitalization policy. The structure of digitalization projects in these countries includes all the necessary components — strategy, coordination, evaluation, intervention, but it is distinguished by a focus on digital change and a political infrastructure that ensures technology interference in the public sphere. Among the significant factors of digitalization policy in the described cases, the idea of sovereignty related to the Internet and digital technologies stands out. The general policy of the countries included in the Eurasian space of cooperation is expressed by the principle of “digital sovereignty†. The article analyses the general understanding of the principle of “digital sovereignty† and the various strategies for its implementation — “multilateral interaction†, “stakeholdercooperation†and “centralized management†, as well as the institutions of management that provide them. Date: 2021 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1588 DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-24-39 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Administrative Consulting from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.