Dialectic of Honor and Reputation. On Limits of Reputation Management Efficiency

V. B. Aleksandrov ()

Administrative Consulting, 2021, issue 8

Abstract: The article justifies the provision that reputational management passes by problems related to the personal meanings of a subject conducting a specific professional activity. It is shown that the category of honor is of particular importance for the expression of this issue. Professional honor in decision-making involves bringing to the fore not the desire to preserve a reputation, but the attitude to preserve personal dignity, accompanied by the willingness to take responsibility for decisions made in critical situations. This willingness is rooted in the fundamental worldviews of the personality that shape its orientation. It is noted that professional honor is a much stronger motivating factor than the desire to maintain a reputation, it determines the attitude to the profession, the desire and willingness to improve in it.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1760/1464 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1760

DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-8-56-64

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Administrative Consulting from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().