“Responsibility to Protect†as a Political and Legal Rationale of Uses of Force in International Relations

Stanislav Valentinovich Korostelev ()

Administrative Consulting, issue 8

Abstract: This article explores the problem addressing the political and legal rationale of the “humanitarian intervention†. The right to perform “humanitarian intervention†is to be derived from moral obligations, and presumed as a resume of the universally agreed prohibition of gross violations of human rights. That right was termed as a “responsibility to protect†, and confessed by the international community as a political obligation, which did not come in contradiction with the law, rather than as a “law†if nothing else.

References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/142/143 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:acf:journl:y::id:142

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Administrative Consulting from Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().