Comparative analysis of selected political party manifestos in South Africa convergences, differences, and implications in public service delivery

France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe, Magatane Tshwarelo Mashilo, Mohale Enerst Selolo, Dilo Justin Ramoshaba and Mathibedi Frank Kgarose
Additional contact information
France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe: University of Limpopo, Department of Development Planning and Management
Magatane Tshwarelo Mashilo: University of Limpopo, Department of Business Management (HRM), Sovenga, Polokwane, 0727, South Africa
Mohale Enerst Selolo: Department of Development Planning and Management, University of Limpopo,
Dilo Justin Ramoshaba: University of Limpopo, Department of Social Work, Sovenga, Polokwane, 0727, South Africa
Mathibedi Frank Kgarose: Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo,

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 2024, vol. 6, issue 4, 373-383

Abstract: This article presents a comparative analysis of selected political party manifestos in South Africa, examining both convergences and differences in their approaches to service delivery. With a focus on understanding the underlying principles and priorities outlined in these manifestos, the study aims to shed light on the potential implications for governance and public service effectiveness. Drawing upon a comprehensive review of political party manifestos and policy documents, the analysis identifies common themes such as access to basic services, infrastructure development, and socio-economic empowerment. However, significant variations emerge in terms of the strategies proposed to address these challenges, reflecting diverse ideological orientations and policy priorities among political parties. By employing a qualitative content analysis approach, the study highlights the nuanced differences in the proposed policy frameworks and implementation mechanisms, as well as the underlying assumptions and values embedded within each manifesto. Furthermore, the analysis explores the potential implications of these variations for public administration practices, governance structures, and service delivery outcomes. Through this comparative lens, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities and dynamics shaping public administration in South Africa's multi-party democracy. Moreover, it offers insights into the challenges and opportunities for enhancing service delivery effectiveness, fostering accountability, and promoting inclusive development. Ultimately, the findings underscore the importance of informed policy debates and evidence-based decision-making in addressing the diverse needs and aspirations of South Africa's citizens, while also emphasizing the critical role of public administration in translating political commitments into tangible outcomes on the ground.

Keywords: Public Administration; Manifestos; Service Delivery; Elections; Political Parties. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/547/322 (application/pdf)
https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.547 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:373-383

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293) is currently edited by Umit Hacioglu

More articles in International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293) from Bussecon International Academy Bussecon International Academy, School of Business, IHU, Ordu cad. F-05 Blok No 3, 34480 Basaksehir, Istanbul, Turkey. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Umit Hacioglu ().