Business-Cycle Durations and Postwar Stabilization of the U.S. Economy

Mark Watson

American Economic Review, 1994, vol. 84, issue 1, 24-46

Abstract: Average postwar expansions are twice as long as prewar expansions and contractions are one-half as long. This paper investigates three possible explanations. The first explanation is that shocks to the economy have been smaller in the postwar period. The second explanation is that the composition of output has shifted from very cyclical sectors to less cyclical sectors. The third explanation is that the apparent stabilization is largely spurious and is caused by differences in the way that prewar and postwar business-cycle reference dates were chosen by the National Bureau of Economic Research The evidence presented in this paper favors this third explanation. Copyright 1994 by American Economic Association.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (116)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819940 ... O%3B2-G&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
Working Paper: Business cycle durations and postwar stabilization of the U.S. economy (1992)
Working Paper: Business Cycle Durations and Postwar Stabilization of the U.S. Economy (1992)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:84:y:1994:i:1:p:24-46

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Review is currently edited by Esther Duflo

More articles in American Economic Review from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().