The Girly Economics of Care Work: Implications for Economic Statistics

Misty Heggeness ()

AEA Papers and Proceedings, 2023, vol. 113, 632-36

Abstract: Unpaid care is work. Yet, the field of economics struggles to acknowledge and measure its value. In modern home economics, the household is unitary and harmonious, time in the home is leisure, and power dynamics are unimportant. Even with the development of household bargaining models, we ignore unpaid care, writing it off as a chosen preference. This view and interpretation bleeds into official statistics hindering our ability to tackle gender inequality and measure all economic activity. In doing so, our profession does a disservice to public policymakers and vulnerable populations, and risks stifling economic growth and opportunity for all.

JEL-codes: C78 D13 D63 I11 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20231108 (application/pdf)
https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20231108.ds (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:apandp:v:113:y:2023:p:632-36

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/subscribe.html

DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20231108

Access Statistics for this article

AEA Papers and Proceedings is currently edited by William Johnson and Kelly Markel

More articles in AEA Papers and Proceedings from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().