Phasing Out Registered Pesticide Uses as an Alternative to Total Bans: A Case Study of Methyl Bromide

Walter L. Ferguson and Jet Yee

Journal of Agribusiness, 1997, vol. 15, issue 01, 16

Abstract: The short-term effect of pesticide bans generally is less efficient production, with higher consumer prices. The higher commodity prices provide windfall profits to producers of affected crops who did not need the banned pesticide, while those producers who were previous users of the banned pesticide may gain or lose, depending on price elasticities of demand and supply. Increased imports may dampen consumer prices and reduce previous gains made by some producers. A crop-by-crop phase-out, based on economic effects in place of an immediate ban on all affected crops, could reduce the adverse effects on consumers, producers, and the balance of trade, while still achieving many of the human health and environmental benefits of an immediate total ban of all pesticide uses on all crops. The soil fumigant, methyl bromide, is used to demonstrate the phase-out strategy.

Keywords: Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/90406/files/JAB15one5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jloagb:90406

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.90406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agribusiness from Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().