Inconsistency in level of care assignment decisions in skilled nursing facilities

V.L. Greene and J. Monahan Deb.

American Journal of Public Health, 1981, vol. 71, issue 9, 1036-1039

Abstract: In Arizona, a no-Medicaid state, we investigated the extent to which unregulated level of care assignments in Skilled Nursing Facilities consistently reflect level and nature of patient impairment. Using Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) to develop optimal prediction functions, approximately 70 per cent of patients could be correctly classified. Factors identified by MDA as discriminating among patients at different levels of care are an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) impairment factor, and a factor defined by confusion, transitory contact with the social environment, and propensity to wander. Results are compared with those of studies using MDA to replicate Multidisciplinary Review Team (MRT) or other expert level of care assignments intended to develop patient classification functions for clinical use. MRT assignments appear to reflect patient impairment characteristics only slightly better than do unregulated institutional assignments, suggesting that such utilization review efforts may result in minimal net gains in appropriateness of placement.

Date: 1981
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.71.9.1036

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.71.9.1036_2

DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.71.9.1036

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().