Ethics committees in neonatal care: Substantive protection or procedural diversion?

G.J. Annas

American Journal of Public Health, 1984, vol. 74, issue 8, 843-845

Abstract: New decision-making procedures will ultimately be judged on the basis of three criteria: accuracy, efficiency, and social acceptability. Ethics committees will probably be as accurate as the current doctor-patient model, and more accurate if they can gather relevant information that might not otherwise be considered; less efficient in terms of time and effort; and worthy of public acceptability only if their primary function is the protection of the infant. If their primary function is protection of the institution, such committees wil serve only to postpone the day of patient-centered reform by temporarily creating the illusion that something is being done to protect vulnerable patients. Experimentation with such committees seems in order; but it is premature to pretend that they can solve the very difficult substantive issues raised by neonatal rescue medicine by simply adding a procedural layer to the decision-making process. The development of substantive standards for decision making remains our first priority.

Date: 1984
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1984:74:8:843-845_1

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().