EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparison of women in and out of a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina perinatal care region

P.A. Buescher, P.J. Meis, J.M. Ernest, M.L. Moore, R. Michielutte and P. Sharp

American Journal of Public Health, 1988, vol. 78, issue 3, 264-267

Abstract: We assessed a prematurity prevention project in a North Carolina region with 21,000 annual births in terms of its impact on low birthweight. Project records were matched to birth certificates in order to compare characteristics of women in and out of the program who received prenatal care from private providers. A logistic regression analysis, in which the effects of race, marital status, age, and other risk factors for low birthweight were statistically controlled, showed that women not in the project were 1.32 times (95% Confidence Interval 1.14, 1.54) as likely as project participants to have a birth under 2500 grams. The relative risk for non-participants for a birth under 1500 grams was 1.87 (95% CI 1.25, 2.80). Strengths and limitations of the study are discussed. The results are consistent with previous work examinating the etiologies of low birthweight in private versus public patients.

Date: 1988
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:3:264-267_2

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Public Health is currently edited by Alfredo Morabia

More articles in American Journal of Public Health from American Public Health Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Christopher F Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1988:78:3:264-267_2