 Pricing TARN Using a Finite Difference MethodXiaolin Luo and Pavel Shevchenko Abstract: Typically options with a path dependent payoff, such as Target Accumulation Redemption Note (TARN), are evaluated by a Monte Carlo method. This paper describes a finite difference scheme for pricing a TARN option. Key steps in the proposed scheme involve tracking of multiple one-dimensional finite difference solutions, application of jump conditions at each cash flow exchange date, and a cubic spline interpolation of results after each jump. Since a finite difference scheme for TARN has significantly different features from a typical finite difference scheme for options with a path independent payoff, we give a step by step description on the implementation of the scheme, which is not available in the literature. The advantages of the proposed finite difference scheme over the Monte Carlo method are illustrated by examples with three different knockout types. In the case of constant or time dependent volatility models (where Monte Carlo requires simulation at cash flow dates only), the finite difference method can be faster by an order of magnitude than the Monte Carlo method to achieve the same accuracy in price. Finite difference method can be even more efficient in comparison with Monte Carlo in the case of local volatility model where Monte Carlo requires significantly larger number of time steps. In terms of robust and accurate estimation of Greeks, the advantage of the finite difference method will be even more pronounced. Date: 2013-04, Revised 2014-08 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:1304.7563 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Papers from arXiv.org |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.