Random Utility with Aggregated Alternatives

Yuexin Liao, Kota Saito and Alec Sandroni

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper studies when discrete choice data involving aggregated alternatives such as categorical data or an outside option can be rationalized by a random utility model (RUM). Aggregation introduces ambiguity in composition: the underlying alternatives may differ across individuals and remain unobserved by the analyst. We characterize the observable implications of RUMs under such ambiguity and show that they are surprisingly weak, implying only monotonicity with respect to adding aggregated alternatives and standard RUM consistency on unaggregated menus. These are insufficient to justify the use of an aggregated RUM. We identify two sufficient conditions that restore full rationalizability: non-overlapping preferences and menu-independent aggregation. Simulations show that violations of these conditions generate estimation bias, highlighting the practical importance of how aggregated alternatives are defined.

Date: 2025-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dcm and nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.00372 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2506.00372

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().