Is Productivity Advantage of Cities Really Down To Mean and Variance?

Vladislav Morozov and Andrea Sy

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Firms in denser areas are more productive, a pattern attributed to agglomeration economies and firm selection. To disentangle these two channels, the popular approach of Combes et al. (2012, ECTA) critically assumes that total factor productivity (TFP) distributions between denser and less dense areas are the same up to mean, variance, and left-tail truncation. We empirically validate this assumption using Spanish administrative firm-level data and recent econometric methods adapted to noisy TFP estimates. Our results find that TFP distributions are indeed statistically identical up to these parameters, validating the use of such productivity decompositions. Furthermore, using only the mean and variance is sufficient to capture differences for all sectors. Accordingly, the productivity advantage of cities may be entirely due to agglomeration rather than stronger selection, suggesting that policymakers should focus on policies targeting agglomeration. Finally, our approach extends to related contexts like differences in worker skill distributions.

Date: 2026-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff, nep-geo, nep-sbm and nep-tid
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.13188 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2604.13188

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().