A Theory of Covenant Accounting Adjustment
Pingyang Gao,
Xu Jiang and
Jinzhi Lu
Papers from arXiv.org
Abstract:
We develop an incomplete-contracting model with accounting-based covenants to study how covenant accounting adjustments are made and what properties they exhibit. Standard accounting rules (e.g., GAAP) can generate false-alarm errors or undue-optimism errors. The manager can exert costly effort to privately identify these errors and propose adjustments. If errors are not corrected, control rights may be inefficiently allocated, leading to costly renegotiation. We show that (1) adjustments always correct false-alarm errors, but correct undue-optimism errors only when their magnitude is small; and (2) the manager may expend socially wasteful effort to identify these errors. The model yields testable empirical predictions and policy implications.
Date: 2026-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.15661 Latest version (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2604.15661
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().