Heavy Tails and Predictive Ability Testing

Jonas F. Frederiksen, Muneya Matsui and Rasmus S. Pedersen

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We study the asymptotic behaviour of widely used tests for evaluating and comparing predictive accuracy when forecast errors exhibit heavy tails. In particular, when loss differentials have infinite variance, the Diebold-Mariano test statistic converges to a nonstandard limit involving non-Gaussian stable random variables. As a consequence, conventional critical values can yield severely distorted inference: a nominal 5$\%$ test may reject a true null as often as 70$\%$ of the time. To establish these results, we develop a new stable limit theorem for strongly mixing, infinite-variance time series processes. Building on this theory, we consider sub-sampling-based inference that remains valid irrespective of tail-heaviness and requires no estimation of long-run variances or tail indices. An application to risk forecasts for emerging-market exchange rates shows that accounting for heavy tails can substantially alter conclusions about predictive performance relative to standard procedures.

Date: 2026-05, Revised 2026-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.16866 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2605.16866

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().