What Does Deep Hedging Actually Learn? Delta Corrections, Regime Fragility, and Symbolic Distillation

Kirill Zernikov
Additional contact information
Kirill Zernikov: New Economic School

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: This paper studies empirical deep hedging for S&P 500 index options under a local downside-shortfall reward. It moves beyond performance comparison by asking what the learned hedge does, when it fails, and whether it can be made auditable. TD3 agents are compared with a daily-updated Black-Scholes delta hedge on the same option episodes. In walk-forward tests from 2015 to 2023, the agents usually learn a systematic delta haircut relative to Black-Scholes. The correction is explained by spot-implied-volatility co-movement and often improves accumulated reward and terminal downside variance, but it is regime-fragile: 2022 exposes losses in adverse daily states, while 2023 shows that underhedging can raise ordinary variance when option P&L is spot-dominated and the volatility channel is unusually weak. Symbolic regression distills the neural policies into compact formulas that can be traded out of sample; these formulas preserve much of the reward, downside-variance, and CVaR advantage over Black-Scholes, and sometimes sharpen it, but inherit the same fragility in difficult regimes.

Date: 2026-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.21696 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2605.21696

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().