EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Credibility Trilemma in Polymatroidal Service Markets

Lauri Lov\'en, Sujit Gujar, Kalle Timperi, Hassan Mehmood, Praveen Kumar Donta, Sasu Tarkoma and Schahram Dustdar

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: Mechanism-mediated service markets with polymatroidal feasibility admit efficient, dominant-strategy incentive-compatible (DSIC) allocation, but these guarantees implicitly assume truthful execution by the marketplace operator. Modelling the operator as a strategic player, we establish a credibility trilemma: for single-parameter agents on a non-modular polymatroid, no static sealed-bid mechanism is simultaneously revenue-optimal, DSIC for agents, and credible for the operator. We introduce the Cost of Non-Credibility (CoNC) as a price-of-anarchy-style welfare-loss measure and obtain tight $\Theta$-bounds across five topology classes (single-edge, series, parallel, tree, series-parallel), plus a matching upper bound $O(|\mathcal{S}|)$ on general DAGs realised by an $\Omega(|\mathcal{S}|)$ witness on the SP-augmented sub-family, turning the trilemma into a structural quantity. Three structurally distinct resolutions follow: public broadcast or deferred-revelation commitment, administrative domain separation under settlement separation and four side conditions, and integrator competition orthogonal to mechanism execution under disjoint actors. An instance-level grounding over the edge-pricing market of Amin et al. confirms the trilemma's robustness on a refereed external setting. The result establishes marketplace neutrality as a first-order design constraint on polymatroidal service markets rather than an implementation detail: where the operator is a strategic player, credibility trades off against revenue optimality and agent incentive compatibility along structurally characterised lines.

Date: 2026-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.26604 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2605.26604

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().

 
Page updated 2026-05-27
Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.26604