When and Why Na\"ive Diversification Works: A Simple Diagnostic Strategy

Han Feng, Difang Huang, Jue Wang and Zhengjun Zhang

Papers from arXiv.org

Abstract: We explain the long-standing puzzle of na\"ive diversification with a simple, testable condition: equal weighting is minimum-variance optimal when the forecast-error covariance matrix has a uniform eigenstructure. This "Golden Criterion" drives a two-stage adaptive strategy that dynamically blends naive and optimized weights based on the empirical distance from this condition. Applied to U.S. equity premium forecasting, the method delivers consistent out-of-sample gains in forecast accuracy, utility, and Sharpe ratios. Diversity-driven shrinkage dominates at short horizons, while optimized weights regain their edge at longer horizons, offering clear horizon-dependent guidance for portfolio construction.

Date: 2026-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.11054 Latest version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arx:papers:2607.11054

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers from arXiv.org
Bibliographic data for series maintained by arXiv administrators ().