Ответственность за нарушения авторского права и смежных прав (ст. 1851 Уголовного кодекса РМ, ст. 96 Кодекса РМ о правонарушениях)

Васили Флоря

Intellectus, 2017, issue 3, 26-29

Abstract: The author cites numerous examples from the practice of application of Art. 1851 of the Criminal Code of RM, Art. 96 of the Contravention Code of RM, emphasizing that legal reality refutes the absolute (strict) territoriality of intellectual rights. Private law relations arising from IARs and means of individualization based on the law of one state are often closely related to foreign law. Multinational intellectual rights are functionally interrelated. This testifies against “strict territoriality” and in favor of “relative territoriality” of national/regional subjective exclusive rights.

Keywords: Copyright and related rights; responsibility; criminal Code; contravention Code (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://agepi.gov.md/sites/default/files/intellectus/intellectus_03-2017_26.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:awf:journl:y:2017:i:3:p:26-29

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Intellectus from State Agency on Intellectual Property (AGEPI)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AGEPI ().