Intergovernmental Transfers and Fiscal Equalization in India: Trends, Challenges, and Reform Options

Roy W. Bahl, Farah Zahir and Deborah L. Wetzel
Additional contact information
Roy W. Bahl: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University
Farah Zahir: Prosperity Vertical, Economic Policy-Public Sector, South Asia, The World Bank
Deborah L. Wetzel: Independent Consultant; Former Senior Global Director, Governance, The World Bank

International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University

Abstract: This paper examines the evolution, structure, and effectiveness of intergovernmental transfers and fiscal equalization mechanisms in India within a comparative federal framework. Drawing on a comprehensive analytical report prepared for the Sixteenth Finance Commission, the study evaluates the extent to which India's fiscal transfer system has addressed both vertical fiscal imbalances between the union and states and horizontal disparities across states. It analyzes long-term trends in revenue assignment, expenditure responsibilities, and the design of Finance Commission transfers, while assessing their equalization impact using descriptive and econometric evidence covering the Tenth to Fifteenth Finance Commissions. The findings suggest that while India's system has historically played a significant equalizing role - particularly during the Eleventh Finance Commission - its effectiveness has moderated over time due to evolving policy priorities, fiscal constraints, and institutional changes. Vertical imbalances remain substantial, with states continuing to account for a larger share of public expenditure relative to their revenue-raising capacity. Horizontal equalization has been achieved to varying degrees, with distribution formulas balancing equity, need, and efficiency, though often without a clearly defined equalization objective. The paper situates India's experience within international practices in countries such as Australia, Canada, Brazil, South Africa, and selected European systems. It highlights key lessons on the importance of defining equalization objectives, improving data systems, and adopting more transparent and norm-based approaches to measuring fiscal gaps. The analysis concludes with policy options for reform, including the potential transition toward a fiscal gap-based equalization system, improved incentive structures for revenue mobilization, and greater clarity in the design of intergovernmental transfer mechanisms.

Pages: 61 pages
Date: 2026-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://ayspsrd.gsu.edu/ays/ispwps/paper2628.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ays:ispwps:paper2628

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU from International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Benson ().