A Critique of Consumer Cooperation: ‘Cheap Cheese’ or the Heavenly Kindgom as the Issue That Divides practical Cooperators from Utopians

Sol Shaviro

American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1982, vol. 41, issue 1, 29-42

Abstract: Abstract. Consumer cooperative reformers, alone among American cooperatiors, define cooperation in terms of the Rochdale Principles. However, to define a cooperative as an organization characterized by owner‐user identity is more useful. Cooperation eliminates profit motivation, not profit itself, as reformers suggest. Consumer cooperators make invidious comparison between consumption and production instead of acknowledging their organic relations. They assign to consumers the same role in uniting the world that Marxists assign to the proletariat. They expect consumer cooperation to promote the brotherhood of man. A better approach than espousing utopian ideals would be to stress practical benefits and economic advantages of cooperative activity.

Date: 1982
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1982.tb01666.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:41:y:1982:i:1:p:29-42

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0002-9246

Access Statistics for this article

American Journal of Economics and Sociology is currently edited by Laurence S. Moss

More articles in American Journal of Economics and Sociology from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().