TESTING HEDGE EFFECTIVENESS FOR FAS 133: THE VOLATILITY REDUCTION MEASURE

Andrew Kalotay and Leslie Abreo

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2001, vol. 13, issue 4, 93-99

Abstract: Although the authors of this article praise the spirit of the new FASB guidelines for hedge accounting, they find flaws in the recommended tests for determining if a hedge qualifies for such treatment. In some cases, the tests recommended by the FASB pass hedges that clearly should fail, and in others they fail hedges that should be accepted. In place of the recommended testing procedures, the authors propose the use of the volatility reduction measure (VRM)—a measure that is fully compliant with the spirit of the FASB's recommendations, while correcting their major shortfalls. While the illustrations in this article are from the realm of fixed income, the VRM approach is applicable to any hedge, whether designated as “fair value” or “cash flow.” Moreover, by expressing volatility in the units of the widely used “Value at Risk” measure, VRM establishes a natural link between accounting and risk management.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00429.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:13:y:2001:i:4:p:93-99

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1078-1196

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance is currently edited by Donald H. Chew Jr.

More articles in Journal of Applied Corporate Finance from Morgan Stanley
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().