FIRST‐MOVER (DIS) ADVANTAGE AND REAL OPTIONS

Tom Cottrell and Gordon Sick

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2001, vol. 14, issue 2, 41-51

Abstract: Fear of losing first‐mover advantages has caused many corporate strategists to ignore real options analysis and simply go ahead with any project that they think is expected to have a positive net present value. But first‐mover advantages are not nearly as valuable as most strategists tend to assume. This article weighs the expected value of first‐mover advantages against the benefits of the real option arising from delay and flexibility. The real options model recognizes the value of delaying projects until important sources of uncertainty and risk can be resolved. After reviewing two well‐known cases of successful second movers—the triumph of VHS over Betamax in VCRs and Microsoft's remarkable late software entries—the authors go on to present more broadly based historical evidence for their view that first‐mover advantages often fail to confer lasting value. The article closes with an assessment of first‐mover advantages in the new economy, including a brief look at recent developments in the Internet and telecom sectors.

Date: 2001
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00329.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jacrfn:v:14:y:2001:i:2:p:41-51

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1078-1196

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance is currently edited by Donald H. Chew Jr.

More articles in Journal of Applied Corporate Finance from Morgan Stanley
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().