Comparing Government Redistribution Across Countries: The Problem of Second‐Order Effects
David K. Jesuit and
Vincent A. Mahler
Social Science Quarterly, 2010, vol. 91, issue 5, 1390-1404
Abstract:
Objective. We offer an alternative to the conventional measure of government redistribution that seeks to address problems of second‐order effects whereby income guarantees arising from public pensions make it less necessary for people to save for their retirement, rendering the “pregovernment” counterfactual to the observed postgovernment distribution unrealistic. Method. We use household‐level data from the Luxembourg Income Study to calculate an alternative measure of government redistribution that includes public‐sector pensions in “pregovernment” income alongside private‐sector pensions, on the assumption that each represents a claim on future income. Results. Employing the alternative method described in the article results in lower values for redistribution than the conventional measure. Conclusion. We suggest that our alternative method be used in addition to the conventional method in cross‐national research, in an effort to achieve a more complete understanding of government redistribution in the developed countries.
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00737.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:socsci:v:91:y:2010:i:5:p:1390-1404
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0038-4941
Access Statistics for this article
Social Science Quarterly is currently edited by Robert L. Lineberry
More articles in Social Science Quarterly from Southwestern Social Science Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().