The Ryder Cup: Are Balanced Four-Ball Pairings Optimal?

Hurley William J
Additional contact information
Hurley William J: Royal Military College of Canada

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 2007, vol. 3, issue 4, 20

Abstract: In the 2004 Ryder Cup Matches, US Captain Hal Sutton decided to pair his two best players, Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson, in the opening four-ball match. The popular press characterized this pairing with the adjectives ``bold" and ``risky" since it is generally thought that balanced teams are preferable to unbalanced. In this paper I compare a Balanced strategy (matching stronger players with weaker players so that the resulting pairs are balanced) against an Unbalanced strategy (matching stronger players with stronger players and weaker players with weaker players) and find the Balanced strategy to be superior, but only slightly so.

Keywords: golf; Ryder Cup; probability; simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1073 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:3:y:2007:i:4:n:6

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jqas/html

DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1073

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports is currently edited by Mark Glickman

More articles in Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().