A Matter of Taste: The Negative Welfare Effect of Expert Judgments

Nicolas Lagios and Pierre-Guillaume Méon

No 11298, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: We study how experts influence consumer behavior and welfare by focusing on the Booker Prize. Leveraging the discontinuity created by the attribution of the prize, we show that readers receive the signal sent by the jury of the Booker and are persuaded to buy the awarded book but experience lower satisfaction due to a misalignment between their tastes and those of the jury. Calibrating a structural model of demand, we find that the prize reduces consumer surplus by $70,039 annually, meaning that a consumer buying an awarded book experiences a loss in surplus of 8% of the book’s average price.

Keywords: awards; prizes; welfare; sales; experts; books; consumer surplus (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 D83 L15 L82 Z11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cul and nep-mic
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11298.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: A Matter of Taste: The Negative Welfare Effect of Expert Judgments (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11298

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().