Protection or Protectionism: The Effect of Technical Regulations on Input Sourcing

Irene Iodice, Camille Reverdy and Irene Iodice

No 11829, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: This paper examines how EU Technical Barriers to Trade (TBTs) reshape firms’ global supply chains, extending Grossman et al. (2024) to incorporate adaptation costs between sourcing partners. To test the model’s predictions, we construct a novel dataset linking EU TBTs to French firm-level import data, trade agreement depth, and a new text-based index of regulatory dissimilarity. We find that greater regulatory distance with the EU significantly reduces both the likelihood and volume of imports. EU TBTs trigger substantial trade diversion: firms shift sourcing toward harmonised suppliers (value +4.4%, quantity +2.1%, entry +2.1pp) and away from non-EU partners (quantity –4.3%, exit +1.3pp, entry –2.6pp). This diversion is significantly weaker for products with high relationship-specific investments, underscoring the role of switching costs in supply chain reconfiguration.

Keywords: NTMs; TBTs; sourcing decisions; trade diversion; economic integration. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 F14 F15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11829.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11829

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().