Do Elections Moderate or Polarize Political Rhetoric?

Tito Boeri, Nina Nikiforova and Guido Tabellini

No 12558, CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo

Abstract: This paper studies how elections shape political communication. We formulate a theory of electoral competition with costly communication. If opposite candidates reach different audiences with their messages, they diverge and seek to polarize the electorate. We then analyze Twitter/X communication by 367 political leaders in 21 countries during 2013-2022, focusing on competition between populists and non-populists. Following Gentzkow, Shapiro and Taddy (2019), we estimate a structural model of speech and show that political rhetoric becomes more polarized before the election. This reflects two main theoretical mechanisms: politicians increasingly emphasize issues distinctive of their type, and within each issue, they use more extreme language.

Keywords: electoral competition; populism; partisanship; polarization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H00 P00 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12558.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Do Elections Moderate or Polarize Political Rhetoric? (2026)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12558

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CESifo Working Paper Series from CESifo Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Klaus Wohlrabe ().