Multiple Use Management of Tropical Forests: On the Superiority of Land Use Specialization
Marco Boscolo
No 41A, CID Working Papers from Center for International Development at Harvard University
Abstract:
One of the debates in tropical forest management centers on how to manage these resources for multiple uses. In fact, although the need to account for multiple values in forestry decisions is widely recognized, its implications for forest management are not clear. In particular, how is multiple-use to be achieved? Should management for multiple values be adopted on each forest management unit? Or should multiple use be attained at the landscape level, for example by dividing the landscape into units and manage each unit for a dominant use (e.g., timber production, conservation, etc.)? In tropical forest settings, where multiple use is often attained with less intensive harvesting and at the expenses of bringing larger – often virgin – areas into production, the circumstances under which multiple-use management is superior to dominant-use remain unclear. Past scholarly work has pointed to some circumstances under which dominant use may be superior to multiple (joint) use. The empirical significance of these circumstances has been quantified only in limited temperate settings. In this paper, we review two circumstances that are likely to yield to a non-convexity in the forest production set: the existence of large fixed costs associated with the production of one good (e.g., timber); and the existence of inefficiencies in the timber production process. The empirical significance of such circumstances is evaluated with the aid of a simulation model developed for a lowland tropical forest in peninsular Malaysia. Results suggest that, for certain benefits associated with forest diversity, specialized use (separation of conservation and timber production processes) is likely to be a strategy superior to multiple use.
Keywords: tropical forests; multiple use; specialization; non-convexities; biodiversity; carbon storage (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/ce ... rking-papers/041.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cid:wpfacu:41a
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CID Working Papers from Center for International Development at Harvard University 79 John F. Kennedy Street. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chuck McKenney ().