Public Segmentation and the Impact of AI Use in E-Rulemaking

Loarre Andreu Perez, Matthew L. Jensen, Elena Bessarabova, Neil Talbert, Yifu Li and Rui Zhu
Additional contact information
Loarre Andreu Perez: Journalism and Media Studies, San Diego State University, USA
Matthew L. Jensen: Management Information Systems Division, University of Oklahoma, USA / Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, USA
Elena Bessarabova: Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, USA / Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, USA
Neil Talbert: Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, USA / Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, USA
Yifu Li: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, USA
Rui Zhu: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Oklahoma, USA

Media and Communication, 2025, vol. 13

Abstract: Digitization has profoundly changed how government interacts with its publics. The expanding use of AI promises even more advancement. However, the rollout of AI is not without risk. This work explores the use of AI in federal rulemaking, the process by which regulations are introduced and revised. The US federal government has created digital platforms that dramatically expand access for the public commenting on pending regulations. However, these platforms also attract volumes of opinion spam that attempt to influence regulatory decision-making. Using AI to identify opinion spam may offer a potential remedy, but removing or limiting comments with the help of AI may threaten rulemaking legitimacy. This research uses the situational theory of problem-solving as a framework, segmenting publics based on their problem recognition, constraints, and involvement with a specific issue, then predicting how each public behaves. We examined how employing AI in the processing of rulemaking comments affects public segments’ intention to comment, their perceptions of legitimacy of the resulting rules, trust in agencies, and control mutuality between the public and the agency. This work describes two controlled, randomized experiments ( N = 149; N = 250) that capture public segments’ reactions to AI use in analyzing comments in the presence or absence of opinion spam. We show that public segmentation is a key aspect in shaping attitudes and behaviors regarding the use of AI for e-rulemaking purposes. These findings suggest that communicating effectively with publics is essential for agencies, and that the use of AI does not make the publics’ attitudes differ.

Keywords: AI; commenting behavior; comment filtering; content moderation; electronic rulemaking; notice-and-comment; opinion spam (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9550 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:meanco:v13:y:2025:a:9550

DOI: 10.17645/mac.9550

Access Statistics for this article

Media and Communication is currently edited by Raquel Silva

More articles in Media and Communication from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().