Fueling Toxicity? Studying Deceitful Opinion Leaders and Behavioral Changes of Their Followers
Puck Guldemond,
Andreu Casas Salleras and
Mariken van der Velden
Additional contact information
Puck Guldemond: Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands
Andreu Casas Salleras: Department of Communication Science, Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Mariken van der Velden: Department of Communication Science, Free University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Politics and Governance, 2022, vol. 10, issue 4, 336-348
Abstract:
The spread of deceiving content on social media platforms is a growing concern amongst scholars, policymakers, and the public at large. We examine the extent to which influential users (i.e., “deceitful opinion leaders”) on Twitter engage in the spread of different types of deceiving content, thereby overcoming the compartmentalized state of the field. We introduce a theoretical concept and approach that puts these deceitful opinion leaders at the center, instead of the content they spread. Moreover, our study contributes to the understanding of the effects that these deceiving messages have on other Twitter users. For 5,574 users and 731,371 unique messages, we apply computational methods to study changes in messaging behavior after they started following a set of eight Dutch deceitful opinion leaders on Twitter during the Dutch 2021 election campaign. The results show that users apply more uncivil language, become more affectively polarized, and talk more about politics after following a deceitful opinion leader. Our results thereby underline that this small group of deceitful opinion leaders change the norms of conversation on these platforms. Hence, this accentuates the need for future research to study the literary concept of deceitful opinion leaders.
Keywords: computational communication science; disinformation; opinion leaders; social media; the Netherlands; Twitter (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/5756 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:4:p:336-348
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v10i4.5756
Access Statistics for this article
Politics and Governance is currently edited by Carolina Correia
More articles in Politics and Governance from Cogitatio Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by António Vieira () and IT Department ().