Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation
Clemence Tricaud
No 15999, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research
Abstract:
This paper provides new evidence on why municipalities are often reluctant to integrate. Exploiting a French reform that made intermunicipal cooperation mandatory, I find that urban municipalities forced to integrate experienced a large increase in construction, consistent with NIMBYism explaining their resistance, while rural municipalities ended up with fewer local public services. I do not find the same effects for municipalities that had voluntarily integrated prior to the law, while both types of municipality enjoyed similar benefits in terms of public transport and fiscal revenues. These findings support the fact that municipalities resisted to avoid the local costs of integration.
Keywords: Local governments; Intermunicipal cooperation; Difference-in-differences; Housing regulations; Local public services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H70 R52 R53 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15999 (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation (2021) 
Working Paper: Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation (2021) 
Working Paper: Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation (2021) 
Working Paper: Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation (2021) 
Working Paper: Better Alone? Evidence on the Costs of Intermunicipal Cooperation (2021) 
Working Paper: Better alone? Evidence on the costs of intermunicipal cooperation (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:15999
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP15999
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().