What Alleviates Crowding in Factor Investing?

Raman Uppal, Victor DeMiguel and Alberto Martin-Utrera

No 16527, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: The growing number of institutions exploiting factor-investing strategies raises concerns that crowding may increase price-impact costs and erode profits. We identify a mechanism that alleviates crowding -- trading diversification: institutions exploiting different characteristics can reduce each other's price-impact costs even when their rebalancing trades are not negatively correlated. Empirically, trading diversification increases capacity by 45%, optimal investment by 43%, and profits by 22%. Using a game-theoretic model, we show that, while competition to exploit a characteristic erodes its profits because of crowding, competition among institutions exploiting other characteristics alleviates crowding. Using mutual-fund holdings, we provide empirical support for the model's predictions.

Keywords: Capacity of quantitative strategies; Price impact; Competition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G23 L11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16527 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:16527

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP16527

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().