Sovereign Liquidity Crises: the Strategic Case for a Payments Standstill

Marcus Miller and Lei Zhang ()

No 1820, CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers

Abstract: Is sovereign debt so different from corporate debt that there is no need for bankruptcy procedures to handle potential defaults? The basic tools of finance seem to confirm that, without water-tight sovereign immunity, creditors face a Prisoner’s Dilemma: litiginous creditors may be tempted to grab what sovereign assets they can in a ‘race of the vultures’. Recent case history also suggests that there may be gains to ‘learning by suing’. To check this by a standstill on payments would doubtless run some risk of debtor’s moral hazard, as the Institute for International Finance have warned in their report on crisis resolution. But not to have an orderly procedure may mean that the IMF is de facto forced to bail out distressed members, leading to the risk of investors’ moral hazard, where investors lend without monitoring (secure in the belief that the international agencies will have to intervene). The strategic case for making legal a standstill on payments is to rescue the authorities from this ‘time consistent’ trap.

Keywords: international institutions; liquidity crises; Moral Hazard; Sovereign Borrowing; Time Consistency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 F34 G12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998-03
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=1820 (application/pdf)
CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org

Related works:
Journal Article: Sovereign Liquidity Crises: The Strategic Case for a Payments Standstill (2000)
Working Paper: Sovereign Liquidity Crisis: The Strategic Case for A Payments Standstill (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:1820

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cepr.org/ ... ers/dp.php?dpno=1820

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers Centre for Economic Policy Research, 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().