Shaking Up the System: When Populism Disciplines Elite Politicians

Emmanuelle Auriol, Nicolas Bonneton and Mattias Polborn

No 18382, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: This paper presents a rational theory of populism using a moral hazard model of policymaking, and shows that rational voters may support populists despite their lack of competence. Our model features an incumbent elite politician who is both office-motivated and policy-motivated, and has policy preferences that deviate from voters' preferences in some states of the world. The voters' problem is to motivate the better informed incumbent to implement their preferred policy. The optimal retention strategy depends on the policy implemented by the incumbent in the previous period and its perceived success, and involves differentiated punishment for a failing incumbent, by electing either another elite politician or a populist. Our analysis provides insight into how political complexity, establishment party polarization, fake news, and politician pay are linked to the populist vote.

Date: 2023-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18382 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Shaking Up the System: When Populism Disciplines Elite Politicians (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18382

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18382

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().