Gender gaps in financial literacy: a multi-arm RCT to break the response bias in surveys

Laura Hospido, Nagore Iriberri and Margarita Machelett

No 18646, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research

Abstract: Gender gaps in financial literacy are pervasive and persistent. They are partly explained because women choose “I do not know†more frequently. We test for the effectiveness of three interventions to shift this behavior. The control survey includes the possibility of “I do not know". The three treatments either exclude this possibility, offer incentives for correct answers, or inform survey takers of the existing gender gap in choosing this answer option. While all interventions are very effective in reducing this answer option, only the information significantly reduces the gender gap in “I do not know†and in financial literacy.

Keywords: Financial; literacy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C8 C9 D14 D91 G53 I22 J16 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18646 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender gaps in financial literacy: a multi-arm RCT to break the response bias in surveys (2024)
Working Paper: Gender Gaps in Financial Literacy: A Multi-Arm RCT to Break the Response Bias in Surveys (2023)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:18646

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
https://cepr.org/publications/DP18646

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DX, UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CEPR ().